Criminal Lawyers' Association v. Ontario (Ministry of Public Safety and Security)

(SCC No. 32172)

 -- Project page --

Email the whole working group

E-mail particular individuals: D. Stratas, B. Elberg, R. Teschner, T. Guy, J. Smithen, H. Bertossi, A. Kardash, I. Bleichert, A. Bourns

 


Current Status (filings)

Judgments

Factums

November, 2008

Motions


Divisional Court judgment

Court of Appeal judgment

 

Appellant's (Ontario's) factum

Respondent’s (CLA's) factum

Ont. Info. Comm.’s factum

 

BC's factum

Canada's factum

Manitoba's factum

NFLD's factum

New Brunswick's factum

Quebec's factum

 

NS’s factum

Media Group’s factum

 

BC Civil Liberties factum

 

Can. Bar Assn. factum

 

Can. Info. Comm. factum

 

Fed’n of Law Soc. of Can. factum

 

 

(1) Motion by Ont gov’t to strike Ont. Info. Comm and Info. Comm. of Canada factums:


Ontario’s motion record (including factum)

 

CLA’s responding factum

 

Media Group’s responding materials

 

Ont. Info. Comm.’s responding materials

 

Can. Info. Comm’s response

 

Ontario’s reply

 

 

(2)  Motion by CLA seeking opportunity to file reply factum and more time for argument:

 

CLA’s factum on the motion

 

Ontario’s response

 



Legislation

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.31

Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. S-26

Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, S.O.R./2002-156


Submissions

CLA Court of Appeal factum

CLA Divisional Court factum

Ministry's Court of Appeal factum

Ministry's Divisional Court factum

IPC's Court of Appeal factum

IPC's Divisional Court factum

Canadian Newspapers Association's Court of Appeal factum




Cases

Attorney-General v. Times Newspapers Ltd. , [1974] A.C. 273 (H.L.)

Babcock v. Canada (Attorney General), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 3

Baier v. Alberta, 2007 SCC 31

Baron v. Canada, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 416

Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswick (Attorney General), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 480

Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v. Canada, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 139

Dagg v. Canada (Minister of Finance), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 403

Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016

Edmonton Journal v. Alberta, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1326

Fernando v. The Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corp., no. 81/95 (S.L. S.C.)

Forests Survey Inspection Request case , 1 KCCR 176, 88Hun-Ma22, September 4, 1989 (South Korea Constitutional Court)

Goodis v. Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 32

Gomery Commission, Restoring Accountability – Recommendations, (v. 1 of the Gomery Commission Report, Part II), ch. 10 (“Transparency and Better Management”)

Guerra v. Italy (1998), 26 E.H.R.R. 357

H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401

Haig v. Canada, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 995

Hakata Railway Station , case no. 1969(shi) No. 68 (Japan S.C.)

Houchins v. KQED, Inc. , 438 U.S. 1 (1978)

Housen v. Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235

Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927

Jones v. Smith, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 455

Joseph Perera v. A.G. (1992), 1 Sri. L.R. 199 (S.L. S.C.)

“Kol Ha’am” Co. Ltd. v. Ministry of the Interior , H.C.J. 73/53 and 87/53 (Isr. S.C. sitting as H.C.J.)

Lalonde v. Ontario (Commission de restructuration des services de santé)  (2001), 56 O.R. (3d) 505 (C.A.)

McLachlin C.J.C., ‘Unwritten Constitutional Principles : What is Going on ? ’ (2005 Lord Cooke Lecture, Wellington, New Zealand, December 1, 2005)

Mittal v. State of Rajasthan (October 20, 2004) (High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan)

Montréal (City) v. 2952-1366 Québec Inc., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 141

Multani v. Commission Scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6

Native Women’s Association of Canada v. Canada, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 627

Netherlands v. Council , C-58/94, [1996] E.C.R. I-2169

On the compliance of Articles 5 and 10 of the Law of the Republic of Lithuania , Constitutional Court of Lithuania (December 19, 1996)

Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2001] 1 S.C.R. 471

People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. U.O.I., January 6, 2004 (Ind. H.C.J.)

R. v. Court and Monaghan (1997), 36 O.R. (3d) 263 (Gen. Div.)

R. v. Kopyto (1987), 24 O.A.C. 81 (C.A.)

R. v. McClure, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 445

Ramsden v. Peterborough (City), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 1084.

Re Eurig Estate, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 565

Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217

Report of the Special Rapporteur, Mr. Abid Hussain, Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression , UN ESC, 1994, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1995/32

Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Protection and Promotion of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Mr. Abid Hussain , UN ESC, 1999, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1999/64

Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia  (1980), 448 U.S. 555

Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression , ESC Res. 1999/36, UN ESCOR, 1999, Supp. No. 3, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1999/167, 134

Ruby v. Canada (Solicitor General), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 3

S.P. Gupta v. President of India and Ors , [1982] A.I.R. (S.C.) 149

Shalit v. Peres , H.C.J 1601/90, H.C.J 1602/90, H.C.J 1603/90, H.C.J 1604/90 (Israel S.C.)

State of U.P. v. Raj Naravan & others , [1975] SCR (3) 333

The Public’s Right to Know: Principles on Freedom of Information Legislation (London: ARTICLE 19, 1999)

U.K. Cabinet Office (Office for Public Service), White Paper – Your Right to Know: The Government’s Proposals for a Freedom of Information Act , by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1997), chapters 1-3

Union of India v. Association For Democratic Reforms , May 2, 2002 (India S.C.)

Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493


Miscellaneous

Constitutional Question

Current list of counsel