EXERCISE E

 

1.         The intention of the parties is that the resolution of disputes under the agreement be governed by the application of Quebec law.

 

2.         The County sent an inspector who made observations as to the condition of the sidewalk and concluded that it was uneven.

 

3.         The court examined a number of cases and stated that there only appeared to be a limited number of instances in which there would exist a duty to disclose the illegal conduct of persons who, through political campaigns, seek election to public office.

 

4.         The fact that the buyer failed to inspect the goods constitutes waiver.

 

5.         Meditrust’s assertion that it is not a proper defendant in this case and, therefore, relief cannot be granted is incorrect.

 

6.         Several nations in response to what they thought to be an inappropriate extraterritorial investigation by the United States enacted blocking statutes intended to frustrate the investigation.

 

7.         Ms. Hall, during the course of her struggle to provide for her children as a single parent, accrued considerable debt to her family and others.

 

8.         Affidavit evidence was filed by the plaintiff and by three witnesses on behalf of the defendant corporation.

 

9.         The amount of damages is determined by the measurement of the profit the dealer would have made by the sale of the car.

 

10.       Service will not be effective unless the document is delivered personally or by mail with an acknowledgment of receipt card.

 

11.       In the absence of any proof to the contrary, the court should presume that the administrator’s functions have not ceased.

 

12.       The right to stop the work is the single most important factor in determining whether a party is in charge of the work within the meaning of the Act.

 

13.       The plaintiff is not in a position to provide additional affidavits to support its contention that W Corp. and Y Corp. are an integrated enterprise at this time.

 

14.       A case management conference was held on Sept. 27, 2006, and the result of said conference was that Williams was given an extension of time until Oct. 13 to respond to Damon’s motion. Williams subsequently failed to file any response thereto.

 

15.       In the event that any employee is requested to testify in any judicial or administrative proceeding, said party will give the company prompt notice of such request in order that the company may seek an appropriate protective order.